This you find around the ๐ŸŒ Internet
๐Ÿ” Web search with Google โ€ข Bing โ€ข DuckDuckGo โ€ข Marginalia โ€ข Reddit โ€ข Spotify โ€ข TikTok โ€ข Tootfinder โ€ข X โ€ข Yandex โ€ข Youtube โ€ข YTM
This you find in the ๐Ÿ›๏ธ Agora
๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Stoas for [[@neil/the great unfettering]]
A Stoa is a public space where people can meet and collaborate.
๐Ÿ“– Document at https://doc.anagora.org/the great unfettering
๐Ÿ“น Meeting at https://framatalk.org/the great unfettering
๐Ÿ“š Node [[the great unfettering]]
โ†ณ ๐Ÿ““ Resource [[@neil/the great unfettering]]
๐Ÿ““ garden/neil/the-great-unfettering.md by @neil ๏ธ๐Ÿ”— โœ๏ธ

The Great Unfettering

URL : https://newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/the-great-unfettering

Author : [[Kai Heron]]

Response to [[Mish-Mash Ecologism]].

From a first quick skim:

  • agrees with need for widening of climate politics to appear to wider base (i.e. working class)
  • seems less critical of degrowth
  • finds issue with the US focus of Huber
  • brings in anti-imperialism to the debate

What matters here is that, like all eco-modernists, Huber assumes capitalist industrialization is the pinnacle of technological advancement. Technology progresses, they suppose, in a linear fashion from inefficient and labour-intensive systems to efficient, energy-intensive, labour-saving ones. Hence, for Huber as for Phillips, the aim should be โ€˜to take over the machine, not turn it off!โ€™

Instead of seeing capitalโ€™s abolition as the unfettering of productive forces, it is better to view it as freeing the worldโ€™s producers to choose from a richer and more diverse array of technologies and socio-ecological relations than capitalist industrialization can offer.

The question, then, is not about whether one is for or against technology โ€“ as if this were possible. It is about adopting appropriate technologies and collectively managing energy and food systems at relevant scales.

Loading pushes...

Rendering context...