[[protocols]] vs [[platforms]] — there’s a lot written about pros/cons of each and I think I intuitively prefer working on protocols (because of interop, etc.) but I need to read more about this.
In ‘Teaching [[Smart]] People How to Learn’, Chris Argyris points out that well-paid professionals, such as [[management]][[consultants]], are very good at learning in a single loop, but not in a double [[loop]].
collapsed:: true
If learning is represented by a thermostat, then single-loop [[learning]] is when the temperature is kept at 65 degrees, and double-loop learning is when the thermostat can figure out why it is kept at 65 degrees, and then find the best way to fit that why.
Professionals are not used to failure, so they don’t know how to [[learn]] from [[failure]]. Failing to learn from failure, they [[blame]] outcomes on others.
By moving any [[talk]] away from how they were [[responsible]] for what happened, they take away their ability to do anything about what happened, and so none of the talk is useful for getting stuff done. [[power]][[responsibility]]
People use [[rules]] to simplify [[complexity]], but the rules they say they used when asked are not the rules they used, as exemplified by the fact their [[movements]] often don’t match their rules.
The rules they use to make [[decisions]] are [[hidden]] by themselves, so it is not subject to [[change]].
Asking about things openly in a way that may brings these [[rules]] out into the open is seen as an [[attack]].
collapsed:: true
People who rarely failed do not know how to [[move]] when they [[fail]].
Given that [[defensive]][[thinking]] is the [[norm]], it is hard to [[change]] anything by trying to change attitudes, or even organizational [[structure]].
There is a [[chance]] of changing things by leaders changing themselves, and examining and testing their own thinking aggressively and honestly.
If we assume the other is stupid or evil, then we do not have to put energy into getting whatever we want- we can say we can’t do it.
In [[lion]] prides, the lead [[male]] is responsible for territorial [[defense]], while the lead [[female]] deals with direct threats. Followers tend to be less injured, because they are not as quick to [[fight]].